On 12/4/20 2:42 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 12/4/2020 2:38 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
That seems really strange because that pretty much describes DKIM as
well, and it's very standards track. And adsp which dmarc made
historic was standards track, and certainly had all of the same
issues with mailing lists, etc.
DKIM did a version of the same thing, but with less time between
publishing the non-IETF work and then having a working group to
produce and IETF version:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4870
vs.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4871
yes, but the new version was standards track. that's what i'm finding
surprising.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
