In article <mn2pr11mb4351d62302c7357de653f8b4f7...@mn2pr11mb4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> you write: >Hello, > >There's currently a ticket that suggests that the requirement for external >validation be removed. Today, if >example.com has an RUA that points at example.net, the latter must create a >record as such: > >example.com._report._dmarc.example.net TXT "v=DMARC1"
Whether or not the mailbombing problem is a practical problem, everyone has already implemented this check so I do not see what problem we would solve by getting rid of it. It's not like the test is expensive or publishing the record is hard. I think it may somewhat mitigate hammering on third parties when someone misspells its rua= target. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
