In article <[email protected]> you write: >We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please >get >on it. > >The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019: > > Apropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be > rate limited per recipient both to break loops and to deter indirect > mail bombing.
>4. Some explicit loop prevention specification may be added. For example: >4.1. send reports from a subdomain having a DMARC record without ruf=, or >4.2. never send failure reports about failed reports. 4.0. Make your failure reports DMARC aligned. Looking at the failure reports in my file, all of the messages actually are aligned, so this is a solved problem. Other than the the possibility of indirect mail bombing via failure reports, which I believe has never happened, I don't understand what problem we are trying to solve here. Since the original comment was mine, I would suggest closing this one as nothing to fix. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
