On 12/8/20 4:51 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:31 PM John R Levine <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The original intent back in RFC 5451 was to relay only those
details that
> an MUA might care about, such as the DKIM result (so you can display
> something representing a "pass" or "fail" on a message) and
maybe the
> domain name found in a passing signature (an early shot at
caring about
> alignment when rendering a message). ...
I suppose but 5451 also says it might be useful to message filters.
Right, there are clearly MUAs that do some amount of spam filtering,
so disposition
of p=quarantine would seem to be useful for that.
Is there any evidence for that though? I would assume that the folks on
this list use a diverse set of MUA's and would be in a position to tell
us if some of them do. I'm guessing by your statement that gmail doesn't
do anything different.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
