Hi Kurt, Murray will correct me if I am wrong, but I have several comments:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, at 12:37 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > I'm wondering why we should wait for IETF110 rather than having an interim > meeting sooner. Interim meetings are also likely to garner greater > participation since they do not include participation fee. If there are > topics worthy of F2F discussion, why wait? If there are not, then why charge > people to join a pointless meeting? 1). All online IETFs this year had "free attendence" option. If people can afford to pay to attend, they should, as this supports RFC publication cost, cost of online meetings, etc. But people can attend for free if needs be. As far as I know this is going to be the case for IETF 110. 2). Chairs are considering interims and we will schedule them if/when needed. 3). Chairs will discuss around February 1st whether we think we can have a productive meeting at IETF 110. We can cancel if there are no reasons to have online meeting during IETF 110 week. Best Regards, Alexey > > --Kurt > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:25 AM IETF Meeting Session Request Tool > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Alexey Melnikov, a >> Chair of the dmarc working group. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Working Group Name: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & >> Conformance >> Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area >> Session Requester: Alexey Melnikov >> >> >> Number of Sessions: 1 >> Length of Session(s): 1 Hour >> Number of Attendees: 76 >> Conflicts to Avoid: >> Chair Conflict: dnsop dprive cfrg kitten emailcore >> Technology Overlap: saag uta extra jmap cbor >> >> >> >> >> >> >> People who must be present: >> Alexey Melnikov >> Murray Kucherawy >> Tim Wicinski >> Seth Blank >> >> Resources Requested: >> >> Special Requests: >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
