On Thu 31/Dec/2020 20:24:59 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article
<CAHej_8kkuQR3_LiV_O5Z-EPvVeZrdTPvCiK7rOmWKxQKsp=6...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
Dave Crocker submitted some suggestions on-list, and I noodled a bit with
the text myself, and submit the following for your collective consideration:
I have a few minor editorial tweaks to suggest but they can wait. I think
we should use this text.
+1, I see it's not yet on github. Please go ahead, possibly posting a .txt as
well, so we can run IETF's diff tool.
Among the minor tweaks I have:
1. In the Abstract, the term email (or mail) appears late. I'd suggest either
"an email author's domain name" or "validation of the domain's email use".
2. Shall we really stick to "RFC5322.From domain"? Rfc5322bis will presumably
get published at about the same time as this I-D, so that terminology is doomed
to sound as antique as message/rcf822. Possible alternatives:
2.1. Author's domain.
2.2. domain part of the From: header field address.
2.3. Main identifier (DMARC's main identifier, when used outside the I-D).
3. In the 1st paragraph, "reports about use of the domain name", /email/ use.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
