Dave I agree. But it seems one person's civil discourse is another person's abuse.
Perhaps we can start from the position that nobody is attempting to insult or abuse one another. I don't believe anyone here consciously wants to be abusive to anyone else. I have been accused of being an optimist. tim On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:52 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/6/2021 8:47 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > You should have a pretty good idea based on these arguments over the past > few months to have a sense of how responses will be received. Take a step > back and take a second read. > > This goes for all. Folks have very specific views of how they think mail > should work > > > Tim, > > This has nothing to do with differences in opinion. It has to do with his > persistent inability to conduct civil discourse in the face of disagreement. > > Disagreement is fine. Abuse is not. > > d/ > > -- > Dave [email protected] > 408.329.0791 > > Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter > American Red [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
