I would think this should prevent problems if at least one complies: Reports should be sent from a no-reply account so that any auto-reply will be rejected as invalid recipient. DMARC reporting SHOULD NOT occur for such messages, even if the DATA section is accepted before rejecting or discarding the message.
Report reception accounts should be dedicated to this purpose. Unacceptable incoming messages to this account SHOULD be excluded from DMARC reporting, regardless of reason. Accepted messages MAY also be excluded from DMARC reporting. Doug Foster On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 11:25 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:51 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I thought that we discussed that ticket and decided that the incidence of >> problems was low enough to warrant a "WONT FIX" determination. >> >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?gbt=1&index=W3uGPEpT3Yi5lqKntZXyL8jkNjk >> > > We did, and if it had only ever come up exactly once, I might think > nothing of it. But here it is again. Now I'm inclined to think where > there's smoke there's fire, and this might require more consideration. > > -MSK, participating > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
