On Mon 18/Jan/2021 20:17:31 +0100 Dotzero wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:14 PM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon 18/Jan/2021 19:56:21 +0100 John Levine wrote:
BTW, the current spec does not mean that an invalid p= implies the
DMARC record is broken. If it did, it wouldn't say to check rua= in
that case.
I know. It would have been better if it didn't say that, but it's too
late to change it now.
I don't understand why you say it's too late. This is not emailcore,
and we don't risk getting back to proposed standard if we change too much.
We're just writing a proposed standard. When choosing between a
better spec and sticking to the existing one what criteria are we
complying with?
You are assuming facts not in evidence, namely that your proposal results
in a better standard.
Not my proposal. John said "it would have been better if...
In general, why are we trying to minimize changes?
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
