Ale, I didn't incorporate that section as I thought that section about Privacy Considerations might be in the main document as it applies to both rua/ruf. I'll work to add something similar for the coming revision, thank you for the note.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: dmarc <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2021 6:21 AM > To: John Levine <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81) > > On Fri 22/Jan/2021 23:40:18 +0100 John Levine wrote: > > > > As someone said, the better the spammers align their stuff, the better > > we can filter it. > > > 100% agreed. > > > > Close this, please. > > > Please don't. That such a doubt can cross the minds even of knowledgeable > people is a real issue. At a minimum, the paragraph I cited[*] should be > restored. A crispy further clarification is welcome. > > Best > Ale > -- > > [*] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HRA > R3hSdckw3mU_Gebh8vcYOjm4__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!VZ89uCnai2kVE35KuFXiBNx_0 > VGYmUVnYzQbjqBfthrbcZ3wazcjrZ0hgM9i2T4iF5MP$ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;! > !CQl3mcHX2A!VZ89uCnai2kVE35KuFXiBNx_0VGYmUVnYzQbjqBfthrbcZ3wazcjrZ0 > hgM9i2d5OX4cb$ _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
