>>> Section 4.1 >>> >>> o Multi-organization PSDs (e.g., ".com") that do not mandate DMARC >>> usage: Privacy risks for Organizational Domains that have not >>> deployed DMARC within such PSDs are significant. For non-DMARC >>> Organizational Domains, all DMARC feedback will be directed to the >>> PSO. PSD DMARC is opt-out (by publishing a DMARC record at the >>> Organizational Domain level) vice opt-in, which would be the more >>> desirable characteristic. This means that any non-DMARC >>> organizational domain would have its feedback reports redirected >>> to the PSO. The content of such reports, particularly for >>> existing domains, is privacy sensitive. >>> >>> It might be worth making some statement about the applicability of PSD >>> DMARC for such PSDs that do not mandate DMARC usage. (I guess the >>> following paragraphs mostly play that role, though perhaps editorially >>> tying them together more clearly is possible.) >> >> I'm not sure where you're going on this, but the following paragraphs do >> try to pull it together. I've been trying to wordsmith these with little >> luck. >> >> Also, it appears that the word "vice" above should be "versus". > > I suspected it might :)
Actually, “vice” as a preposition has a meaning similar to “versus” (you could look it up).[1] That said, I think that “versus” is better known and better understood, so, despite my general preference to avoid Latin terms and abbreviations, we should switch to “versus”. Barry [1] “You Could Look It Up” is a James Thurber reference: https://storyoftheweek.loa.org/2010/09/you-could-look-it-up.html
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
