All
When I raised the point for dmarc-bis making sure that new tags define
their ABNF, I realized that the PSD document does no such thing.
It does describe the definition, as it's the same as the "sp" tag.
I added the following section to dmarc-psd updating 7489 as such:
3.3. Changes in Section 6.4 "Formal Definition"
The ABNF for DMARC shall updated to include a new definition "dmarc-
nprequest" which is defined as:
dmarc-nprequest = "np" *WSP "=" *WSP
( "none" / "quarantine" / "reject" )
The "dmarc-record" definition is also updated to include the
following:
[dmarc-sep dmarc-nprequest]
I am well aware that the dmarc-bis draft has much cleaner ABNF, but this
document still updates 7489, so
we must follow what is there.
I've pushed a new version -15 into my own repo:
https://github.com/moonshiner/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
I'd like the WG to double check what is here, making sure this will be
enough. I'll push out -15 by the
end of the week.
thanks
tim
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
