+1 Ken.
________________________________ From: dmarc <[email protected]> on behalf of John Levine <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2021, 19:02 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #11 (and #112) - Proposed language It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: >It might make sense to reject that ~30% which doesn't even have an >organizational domain (dubbed totally astray in my previous post). But I still >receive From: <[email protected]> on a mailing list. Rejecting that >risks getting unsubscribed. Perhaps mailing lists deserve a special >permission... Or perhaps mailing lists should refrain from forwarding messages from cowards who use fake addresses and don't sign their mail. Either way, I still don't see what this has to do with DMARC. Let's close ticket #112 and stop. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
