I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02, which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance to do so.
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:29 PM Steven M Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote: > > > Consensus on Ticket #4 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/4>(Definition > of "fo" parameter) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update > the definition of the "fo" parameter with the following sentence, as shown > in dmarcbis-01: > > The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list of the > options represented by alphabetic characters. > > > It is understood from the discussion that ABNF for the "fo" tag will have > to be updated, and this update will happen in the next version of dmarcbis, > scheduled for release in the next few weeks. > > > I support the proposed change. > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > -- *Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
