On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:53 PM Brotman, Alex <Alex_Brotman= [email protected]> wrote:
> I also feel like the document needs a better definition of Mediator (I > didn’t see one in the document). > It's implied/inferred from this text in Section 3.1, Conventions Used in This Document: Readers are encouraged to be familiar with the contents of [RFC5598]. In particular, that document defines various roles in the messaging infrastructure that can appear the same or separate in various contexts. -- *Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
