On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:56 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I understand it, it is not typical IETF practice to do conformance > specifications. The IETF practice is to define requirements for > interoperability. > > I think that the whole section should just go. It's not the IETF's job to > specify contractual requirements for DMARC implementation. The > requirements > for this should be defined by the entity levying the requirements. Here's > an > example excerpted from a publicly available source: > This +1! This proposed section is not about interoperability. Dump it. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
