>> Sorry, but I've lost track of which document would informationally >> document this issue. >> >> The re-writing hack is an operational one that might or might not prove >> the be transient. Having a spec note the effect of what it does, in >> terms of rendering mailing use problematic, is reasonable. >> >> Having a spec go into details about the hack of the moment isn't. On >> the other hand, it's reasonable to put such discussion into a companion >> 'usage' doc, IMO. > > > He didn't specify, but I took the suggestion to mean a new document, not any > of the current ones.
Indeed; it would be bizarre to put it into an existing document, and I don't think I've exhibited symptoms of bizarritude (though I suppose if I had I might not know...). Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
