I’m the Author of that pamphlet and yes „slow-entry“ stands for rate limiting, as we do not plan to reject traffic completly, I also would like to mention that this is a WIP document and I’m fascinated that it pops up here, as it only was a small comment on a completly different topic. I would also like to emphasis that this is not directly DMARC related as the goal we want to achieve is different and we also plan to bring our DMARC implementation forward at the same time.
/ Tobias Herkula -- Senior Product Owner Mail Security Product Mail Platform 1&1 Mail & Media GmbH Von: dmarc <dmarc-boun...@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Douglas Foster Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2021 19:37 An: Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> Cc: dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org> Betreff: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC variations What is meant by "slow entry" in the title? Does it mean that non-compliant messages will be throttled with 4xx temporay failure result codes? On Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 10:51 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it<mailto:ves...@tana.it>> wrote: Hi all, this proposal by some German mailbox providers sounds interesting: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQeodijKJJJPX6fCma3tm00n8m0aJI0VyuO17hKXTy0y7JYUzIxd5Cqh2VSttvJkw-yxWK5fT8NFDcO/pub Note that it "is not directly referencing DMARC as a technology with similar functionalities, as [they] strive to establish a common ground, where DMARC, BIMI and future Systems can build up additional benefits for all sides." Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org<mailto:dmarc@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
