On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 4:07 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What does "an agreed-upon level in the DNS hierarchy" mean? The > organizational domain is the current "agreed-upon level". Is this the > same or > something different? We know you can't do this by counting dots in a > domain > name. If it's the same level as the current organizational domain, then > I'm > not sure why we would want to add more lookups. I'm not aware of a > problem > that would solve. If it's all the way to the top of the hierarchy, then > I'm > confident the answer is no. Regardless of exactly how the PSD experiment > lands, the rules for a PSD level lookup need to be different than for an > individual organization, so we still need to know where the break between > the > organizational level and the top level is (so still not sure why you would > want to do more lookups). > > There are two tickets of the eleven that advocate walking the tree. One, ticket #60, suggests walking the entire DNS tree until a policy is discovered. The other, ticket #121, champions a "one level tree walk". My use of the phrase "an agreed-upon level in the DNS hierarchy" was meant to acknowledge that both tickets exist, and that both propose the same method (tree walking) with different end points. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
