On Fri, 29 Oct 2021, Dave Crocker wrote:
Every gTLD operator has a web of contracts with ICANN, and Verisign also
with the US government, which severely constrain what they can do with
their TLDs.
Yes, yes. All of them are well-behaved, following all the rules, and the
rules perfectly protect against misbehaviors, which they'd never think of
finding a way around.
Can you explain what this line of argument has to do with DMARC? I'm
drawing a blank.
If it's that any TLD operator might at any time do something horrible,
even though they never have before, it seems to me that the only
reasonable option is to abandon the DNS.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
