On November 3, 2021 2:09:04 AM UTC, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>It appears that Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said:
>>4. Common parent domain not marked PSD. We could add a new tag to the DMARC
>>records for PSDs to indicate it's a PSD, so it's record shouldn't be used for
>>alignment. Getting this added to the literal handful of PSD records that
>>exist and specifying it should be used going forward is doable. To implement
>>this approach should produce identical (modulo PSL errors and omissions)
>>results to the RFC 7489 approach. It seems like we've decided to trust that
>>ICANN and ccTLD operators will effectively manage publication of PSL records
>>for policy discovery, so this leverages that trust to simplify alignment
>>while
>>maintaining backward compatibility.
>
>This is a much better worked out version of my DNS tree climbing proposal. I
>like it too.
>
>R's,
>John
>
>PS: Just out of nosiness, what PSD records exist now?
Thanks. As far as I know, .gov, .mil, .gov.uk, and .police.uk.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
