It appears that Wei Chuang <[email protected]> said: >If the RFC2045 canonical representation at the final destination can be the >same as the canonical representation at the original sender, ...
When we were working on DKIM canonicalization we had lengthy discussions about what to do about MIME and we decided not to even try. There is no canonical representation of a MIME message and nobody to my knowledge has ever tried to describe what it would mean for two MIME messages to be equivalent, since they could vary in a fantastic number of ways. Part separators can change, the pieces of multipart/whatever might change, line breaks in quoted-printable and base64 can change, spacing and capitalization of headers can change, and that's just what I can think of in two minutes. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
