On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 10:00 AM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >This was reported but not sent to the WG. I believe the right disposition > >is "Hold for Document Update". Does anyone want to argue for "Rejected" > or > >"Verified"? > > Reject it. Whether you choose to believe the non-ICANN part of the PSL is > local policy. > > I also think that Scott's example in the notes is wrong. It is perfectly > plasuble for an operator's customers to have their own DMARC policy, > although most > of the subdomains are less exotic than this one. Try Centralic's us.com > where I think you would not want foo.us.com and bar.us.com to share the > same default policy. > > R's, > John >
+1 Scott's example, which he states as wrong, is in fact correct. The org domain should in fact be example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com and not amazonaws.com, as amazonaws.com is not the organization which controls policy for, or should receive reports for, the organization which has registered and is using example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com. Seth, as an individual > > >---------- Forwarded message --------- > >From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > >Date: Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:31 PM > >Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (6729) > >To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, < > [email protected]> > >Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > > > > > >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7489, > >"Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)". > > > >-------------------------------------- > >You may review the report below and at: > >https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6729 > > > >-------------------------------------- > >Type: Technical > >Reported by: Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > > > >Section: 3.2 > > > >Original Text > >------------- > > 3. Search the public suffix list for the name that matches the > > largest number of labels found in the subject DNS domain. Let > > that number be "x". > > > >Corrected Text > >-------------- > > 3. Search the ICANN DOMAINS section of the public suffix list for > > the name that matches the largest number of labels found in the > > subject DNS domain. Let that number be "x". > > > >Notes > >----- > >The PSL includes both public and private domains. RFC 7489 should have > >limited name matching to the public, ICANN DOMAINS section of the PSL. As > >an example, using the current PSL, the organizational domain for > >example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com is > >example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com, not amazonaws.com > since > >it is listed in the private section of the PSL. This is clearly the wrong > >result. > > > >Instructions: > >------------- > >This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > >-------------------------------------- > >RFC7489 (draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base-12) > >-------------------------------------- > >Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and > >Conformance (DMARC) > >Publication Date : March 2015 > >Author(s) : M. Kucherawy, Ed., E. Zwicky, Ed. > >Category : INFORMATIONAL > >Source : INDEPENDENT > >Area : N/A > >Stream : INDEPENDENT > >Verifying Party : ISE & Editorial Board > > > >-=-=-=-=-=- > >[Alternative: text/html] > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > -- *Seth Blank * | Chief Product Officer *e:* [email protected] *p:* 415.273.8818 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
