On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:38 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > I took a look at sections 4.5 and 4.6 of the draft, the part that > describes the tree walk > and PSD, and unfortunately what it currently says is seriously wrong. > Apologies for > not catching this sooner. > > > No worries; that's what draft revisions are for...
I'll work to rewrite these sections for the next version. Scott Kitterman, do you mind if I just incorporate your suggested text re:PSD into that same rev, rather than your going through the machinations of a pull request? -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
