> > Um, the whole point of the tree walk is so we do not use the PSL, which > > has all sorts of well known problems we've already discussed at length. > > Yes. Please. We've already been through all this, let's not do it again.
Indeed: the purpose of this thread is to correct a problem with how the tree walk is specified. Revisiting the discussion we had and resolved before is out of scope unless someone truly has NEW information that we did not consider before. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
