It appears that Steve Siirila <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >After reading this thread, I couldn't help but wonder about how the >addition of a "PSD flag" specifically targeted to DMARC might be repurposed >for other non-DMARC applications since my understanding is that the PSL is >currently being used for other purposes as well. Just food for thought.
Since the PSD flag only appears in records at _dmarc.whatever I doubt there will be many non-DMARC applications looking at them. More saliently, we had an entire working group called DBOUND that tried and failed to come up with a way to publish boundary info about the DNS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dbound/about/ I had what I thought was a dandy proposal, implemented here: https://github.com/jrlevine/bound R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
