I don't see that the current language is in any way limited to the soecial case of only -ALL. I read it as a general warning.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 11:26 AM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears that Dotzero <[email protected]> said: > >> I agree with Ale. Further, it is not as if we are considering this in a > >vacuum. Since originally being made public, DMARC has been widely > >implemented and it has not been identified that this (early reject on SPF > >-all) has been a significant or even an insignificant problem based on > data. > > A bare -all is clearly a special case, the converse of null MX, that > means no mail at all. I agree the current wording is fine. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
