On Sun 03/Apr/2022 04:49:03 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said:
2. In the policy discovery section I added a few sentences on which policy to
use once the policy record is identified. This doesn't change anything
relative to what's currently defined, but it seems to me that if we are going
to have a discussion of policy discovery we should take it all the way to
determining the poilcy and not stop at the determination of the record to use
to determine the policy.
It still gets the wrong answer for psd=n above psd=y.
Why?
I think it needs to say you walk up. At each step if you find psd=n,
that is the org domain and you stop.
Right, that's step 1 of 4.8.
If you find psd=y, that is the PSD, the org is the name beneath it, and you
stop.
Yup, unless that's the From: domain (the sending PSO case).
(If the one beneath it has no DMARC record, is it still the org domain? I
think it is.)
This seems to be inconsistent with the sentence that follows. Would the
landscape change if .com suddenly publishes psd=y?
If you get to the top and there was no record with psd=y or psd=n, the
org is the highest DMARC record you found.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
