I've finished going through this and also updated authheaders [1] to match.  It 
now has a script called dmarc-policy-find which you can used to determine the 
DMARC policy to be applied for a domain.  You can use RFC 7489, RFC 7489 + RFC 
9091, and DMARCbis-07.  

It does currently cheat and assume psd=y is in the records for domains on the 
PSD DMARC registry list, since no one has actually published that yet.

Scott K

[1] https://github.com/ValiMail/authentication-headers (also on pypi)

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 12:27:04 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I believe it does.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott K
> 
> On April 6, 2022 2:53:59 PM UTC, Todd Herr 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> >I believe this rev has the proposed text that was submitted in various
> >messages in the thread titled "*5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy for the
> >Author Domain - dmarcbis-06"*
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 10:51 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >> directories.
> >> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
> >> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
> >> 
> >>         Title           : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
> >> 
> >> and Conformance (DMARC)
> >> 
> >>         Authors         : Todd M. Herr
> >>         
> >>                           John Levine
> >>         
> >>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt
> >>         Pages           : 62
> >>         Date            : 2022-04-06
> >> 
> >> Abstract:
> >>    This document describes the Domain-based Message Authentication,
> >>    Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) protocol.
> >>    
> >>    DMARC permits the owner of an email author's domain name to enable
> >>    verification of the domain's use, to indicate the Domain Owner's or
> >>    Public Suffix Operator's message handling preference regarding failed
> >>    verification, and to request reports about use of the domain name.
> >>    Mail receiving organizations can use this information when evaluating
> >>    handling choices for incoming mail.
> >>    
> >>    This document obsoletes RFC 7489.
> >> 
> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/
> >> 
> >> There is also an HTML version available at:
> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.html
> >> 
> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07
> >> 
> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> >> :internet-drafts
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dmarc mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc




_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to