On Mon 11/Jul/2022 21:54:25 +0200 John Levine wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:We are proposing an alternative to the PSL without having any experience of it. I think a Proposed Standard should give full explanations of design choices, so that possible, future amendments can be thoughtful and considered.Could you explain, preferably in detail, why Appendix A.6 in the draft doesn't do that?
A.6 seems to be dealing with a different subject. I can still sketch some text to be added there, though. I attach the diff.
Best Ale --
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8; name="Diff_draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-12.txt.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
