On July 18, 2022 9:21:33 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat 16/Jul/2022 16:20:09 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote: >> >> My proposal: >> Sibling authentication should be disabled by default, even for policies that >> specify relaxed authentication. Those organizations that want sibling >> authentication should explicitly request it using a tag (to be defined) on >> the Organizational Domain policy. If the tag is not present, relaxed >> authentication enables only exact, parent-child, and child-parent >> relationships. > > >I'd be in favor of introducing a third mode, adkim=n, say, for not-so-relaxed. > >Since it'd be a new feature, it cannot be the default. Those who don't >recognize it should ignore it and assume adkim=r. >
What issue does this address that isn't addressed by using psd=n? Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
