> What I am hearing is: > > "DMARC permits evaluators to meet the needs of certain domain owners, > specifically domain owners who > publish a DMARC policy." > > I am disappointed with the perceived indifference to the needs of evaluators.
There's a reason for that: DMARC was designed for senders to publish policy and for evaluators to evaluate based on the published policy. DMARC was not designed for evaluators to assume anything when no policy is published. It's valid to want some system where recipients can evaluate things on their own, absent anything published by senders (this is, for example, what "best-guess SPF" was). But that isn't DMARC, and DMARC was never meant to handle that. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
