I re-read the I-D and applied some more substantive changes.
I don't find the changes improve clarity, but whatever.
How about if you fix the markdown so it has the current contents of the
draft, and you add a Makefile that can turn the markdown into XML and the
XML into text and HTML one can look at. You can use the markdown and
makefile in the dmarcbis repo as models. Then push it to github and post
an updated draft.
Hm... I'd start by posting the updated draft. It'd probably take me some
days to learn how to obtain the same XML file starting from a markdown one
rather than editing it directly. As the existing draft expires on the 21st,
I'd revert the order of operations.
If it takes more than an afternoon to fix the markdown to produce an
equivalent draft, something is wrong. Perhaps someone else could do the
editing?
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
