We discussed this a while back and I think we we agreed that the text is correct as is. Scott?
R's, John It appears that Eliot Lear <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6729 > >Dear Murray and DMARC group, > >Please comment on the following reported erratum by Scott Kitterman >against RFC 7489, an independent submission. I did not participate in >the development of this RFC, and could see arguments on either side of >this issue. In particular, I don't think the author thought that >spinning up a VM meets the bar for generating high quality email. On >the other hand, that bar itself may not serve a meaningful purpose. >Left to my own devices, my intent would be to mark this one "Hold for >update", and will do so in the next month or so, unless given good cause >not to. > >Eliot > > >Date Reported: 2021-11-01 > >Section 3.2 says: > > 3. Search the public suffix list for the name that matches the > largest number of labels found in the subject DNS domain. Let > that number be "x". > >It should say: > > 3. Search the ICANN DOMAINS section of the public suffix list for > the name that matches the largest number of labels found in the > subject DNS domain. Let that number be "x". > >Notes: > >The PSL includes both public and private domains. RFC 7489 should have >limited name matching to the public, ICANN DOMAINS section of the PSL. >As an example, using the current PSL, the organizational domain for >example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com is >example.s3.dualstack.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com, not amazonaws.com >since it is listed in the private section of the PSL. This is clearly >the wrong result. > >-=-=-=-=-=- >[Alternative: text/html] >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >[Attachment type=application/pgp-signature, name=OpenPGP_signature] >-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
