On Monday, August 29, 2022 7:57:26 AM EDT Douglas Foster wrote: > As currently defined, psd=u seems to contain no information and be > identical to no token. I see no value in defining a tag that has no > meaning. > > It could optionally be defined to mean "this is an organizational subdomain > which will lead to a psd=n tag". Then if the Tree Walk ends on anything > other than a psd=n tag, we have a PERMERROR. This type of tag might be > useful as a warning to PSL uses when the PSL is known to have an unwanted > entry causing the PSL result to be an organizational subdomain. > > But unless that redefinition is desirable, I suggest dropping psd=u > completely.
Doug, We initially didn't have it and decided we needed it. Would you please review the mailing list discussion that led us to add it and specifically tell us what was incorrect in that rationale that would cause us to revisit the point? Initially, I held this view as well, but the discussion changed my mind. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
