On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:10 AM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2022 10:59:55 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote: > > Version created from the pull request John mentioned on-list on August > 28. > > Thanks. > > Why did you remove the specific paragraph pointers for the references? Is > that > the norm in IETF documents? It seems to me it makes things less clear. > I can't speak for John, but I'm not sure it was his intent to do so. Attached is a sample diff as shown in Github for the changes, and it seems clear that his intent was to insert the section reference inside the square brackets. However, since those square brackets are meaningful to the process that goes from markdown to XML to RFC, the references disappeared. Unless it's IETF norm to not have specific sections referenced, I agree that they should be put back. > Also, I am reminded that since this document will obsolete RFC 9091 if > approved, we need to incorporate the Privacy Considerations from that > document > instead of referencing them. I'll prepare a recommend change for that. > > Scott K > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
