On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 7:01 AM Douglas Foster < [email protected]> wrote:
> You did not mention the differences in aggregation. > AOL/Yahoo/Verizon send a unique report for each target domain, even though > this approach has been rejected as unnecessary and more likely to involve > privacy violations. > Who rejected this approach as unnecessary? Also, please describe the privacy violations about which you're concerned, and compare and contrast your position with that of this document - https://certified-senders.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Report_DMARC_and_GDPR.pdf -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
