On Thu 13/Oct/2022 15:48:55 +0200 Barry Leiba wrote:
There is no report; this paragraph is all the report we have (and I think
it’s all we will get and all we need).
Hm... Indeed, I searched old mail logs and found no evidence that one of the
domains (bank|gov|insurance|gov.uk|police.uk|mil|gov.in) was ever a target of
an aggregate report from me. However, I ascribe this lack of logs to the
likely circumstance that I never received messages reportable to them, rather
than hypothesizing that my implementation was wrong.
Best
Ale
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 5:49 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed 12/Oct/2022 22:44:10 +0200 Todd Herr wrote:
At Barry's request, I added a couple sentences to section 7.3 to talk about why
this document obsoletes RFC 9091.
This:
The DNS Tree Walk also incorporates PSD policy discovery, which was
introduced in [RFC9091]. [RFC9091] was an Experimental RFC, and the
results of that experiment were that the RFC was not implemented as
written. Instead, this document redefines the algorithm for PSD
policy discovery, and thus obsoletes [RFC9091].
I missed the report about the experiment results. Any pointer?
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
