On Wednesday, December 28, 2022 11:19:46 AM EST Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Appendix A5 in the I-D describes "Issues with ADSP in Operation". This > appendix existed in RFC 7489 (March 2015), when ADSP was already set to > Historic (November 2013). > > Bullet #2 in that appendix says "Nonexistent subdomains are explicitly out > of scope in ADSP." DNARC, instead has an apposite np= policy. > > However, in Authentication-Results one can write dkim-adsp=nxdomain. I > found no equivalent result for dmarc=. Shouldn't there be one?
nxdomain isn't a DMARC result, so from that perspective, no. I think a better question is should the A-R header field indicate which tag was used for policy determination (p=, sp=, np=). I think the answer is, again, no. Is that currently captured in aggregate reporting? If we're going to indicate it anywhere, I think that's the right place. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
