A couple suggestions for slides:

   - Could Scott or someone distill Scott's comments
   <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/hgW7P5jcEl12b2MScnBu0AJ90Q0/>
into
   a slide?
   - Could someone put what is known about "What’s needed to deal with the
   indirect mail flow problems?" into a slide?
      - I volunteer some version of the "Mailing-List Authentication
      Comparison" Google docs (link
      
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/115cOqpNJ3URFoPg2ZJwoS0ZxujIXHpk9MCvcJuFgH-Y/edit?usp=sharing>)
      much summarized
      - That docs is missing two recent ideas I heard: Levine's proposal to
      wrap message message/rfc822 and Ale's proposal to provide a mailing-list
      opt-in procedure to avoid From munging.

Separate point:

   - Can the discussion on "SPF use in DMARC" include the optional "auth="
   and in particular "auth=dkim"?

-Wei

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:29 PM Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Other than the chars’ agenda slide, I have no slides for Friday, with a
> plan of just discussing ideas and text — so everyone, please do read the
> text proposals and be prepared to discuss them.
>
> That said, if anyone has slides to propose, please do so by end of the
> work day Thursday.  I do not plan to approve any slides posted after 6pm
> San Francisco time on Thursday.
>
> Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to