IMHO, the interoperability sections 8.5 and 8.6 as currently in the
dmarcbis I-D are necessary and useful. They may require minor changes,
spelt out below. By contrast, Section 7.6 is useless and should be removed.
Section 8.6, *Interoperability Considerations*
The second part of the section suggests that receivers apply /more
analysis/ before rejecting a message based on DMARC results. Such analysis
is not specified, so those paragraphs might be misunderstood as a generic
invite to not honor DMARC. I suggest to specify more exactly what
receivers are invited to do.
OLD
| It is therefore critical that receiving domains MUST NOT reject
| incoming messages solely on the basis of a p=reject policy by the
| sending domain. Receiving domains must use the DMARC policy as
| part of their disposition decision, along with other knowledge and
| analysis.
NEW
| It is therefore REQUIRED that receiving domains exempt from DMARC
| disposition messages forwarded by trusted third parties, either
| aliases or mailing lists, provided that forwarders are authenticated
| by a secure method. Receiving domains must seek methods to
| acknowledge forwarders' quality and grant trust where deserved.
Section 8.5, *Interoperability Issues*
This section seems to me to lack some kind of conclusion. What do we mean
by /interoperability/, actually? Here's an attempt:
OLD
Mail that is sent by authorized, independent third parties might not be
sent with Identifier Alignment, also preventing a "pass" result.
NEW
Mail that is sent by authorized, independent third parties might not be
sent with Identifier Alignment, also preventing a "pass" result. In
case of strict policies, this can prevent proper functioning of alias
or mailing list forwarding (Section 3.9 of [RFC5321]). The "improper"
functioning that often results is an interoperability issue.
Best
Ale
--
I'm writing on the same, seldom used laptop that yesterday failed.
I had got it in Atalanta in 2012, when the previous device unexpectedly
crashed.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc