> One last thing, how about directly assessing extensibility? > > dmarc-method = %s"dkim" / %s"spf" / dmarc-value
First, why the "%s"? I see no reason to make the method name case sensitive. Second, there's no need for "dmarc-value". With Tim's original proposal: > dmarc-method = "dkim" / "spf" ...a spec that adds a new method called "newthing" can simply use this: dmarc-method =/ "newthing" Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
