I'm sorry, to what are you referring? I co-chair the M3AAWG technical committee, and am unaware of any advocacy for relitigating DBOUND...
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 6:36 PM Neil Anuskiewicz <neil= [email protected]> wrote: > M3AAWG is advocating for DBOUND as most of you likely know. Does it seem a > viable alternative? We could sure use the support of M3AAWG. How could we > earn their support or are they committed to DBOUND? > > Perhaps once we prove that DMARCbis works they’ll reconsider. > > Neil > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > -- *Seth Blank * | Chief Technology Officer *e:* [email protected] *p:* This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
