On 11/12/23 04:56, Dotzero wrote:
Our original intent (I'm one of the folks behind DMARC) was that
failure reports would be provided to senders just like aggregate
reports. This was before GDPR and privacy concerns did a number on the
practice. The companies that provide the service of managing these
FBLs for you typically allow you to view and/or download the reports.
+1 on the original intent - we were on the cusp of having a network of
paid services and bi-lateral information sharing agreements, but instead
the group decided an open system anybody could participate in would be
better. Not that it would be effortless to participate and benefit, it
obviously takes a lot of work, but it would be possible if one put in
the effort and resources.
+1 on the general decline due to a changing PII landscape.
There are still some sources sending failure reports, but they tend to
be smaller operators.
And even in a world of "private failure reports," having the format
standardized is a useful thing.
--Steve.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
