It appears that Scott Kitterman  <[email protected]> said:
>I don't think that's sensible at all.  It's not the place of a signing filter 
>to modify the message.  I think it would be reasonable to either add a 
>signature for
>each from domain or to decline to sign it at all, but since DKIM doesn't care 
>about from domain at all, I think it would be up to whatever calls the signing 
>filter
>to specify.

I agree but I'd be more inclined to say don't sign at all, since
multi-valued From headers are rare and as likely as not to be a
mistake.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to