Heads up that I'm going to be looking carefully at use of "SHOULD" throughout the document when it comes to AD Evaluation. An example that gave me pause:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:30 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > in section 5.5.1, Publish an SPF Policy for an Aligned Domain, the last > sentence says: > > The SPF record SHOULD be constructed > at a minimum to ensure an SPF pass verdict for all known sources of > mail for the RFC5321.MailFrom domain. > Why is this a SHOULD? In fact the whole section is made up of three SHOULDs, so I could do none of them for my own reasons and still claim to be "doing DMARC". Are we OK with that? (Maybe we are, but I want to be sure.) -MSK, AD hat on but askew
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
