On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:33 PM OLIVIER HUREAU < [email protected]> wrote:
> >> dmarc-version = "v" equals %s"DMARC1 > > I believe the "%s" should be dropped > > 'DMARC1' is case-sensitive in 7489. > Either we keep the "%s" or we go back to 7489 version : "%x44 %x4d %x41 > %x52 %x43 %x31" > > Oh yes you are right - thanks > I think it should be %x20-3A / %x3C-7E > Agreed. > > I would also add comment about the dmarc-fo ABNF : > > dmarc-fo = "0" / "1" / "d" / "s" / "d:s" / "s:d" > > The FO paragraph ( > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.html#name-general-record-format) > explicitly states that there exist 3 kinds of failure reports : > - DMARC failure report. > - DKIM failure report. > - SPF failure report. > > You got me going back to 7489 and the mail archives. First it appears we did have some discussion about this part of the ABNF https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2TT-2WiNVwCXozBz0JYRI1F1qME/ However, with the current ABNF, we could only ask for "DMARC failure > report" or ("DKIM failure report" and/or "SPF failure report") > > Shouldn't we have an ANBF rule with all the possible permutations or a more > generic one such as : > > dmarc-fo = dmarc-fo-value *(":" dmarc-fo-value) > dmarc-fo-value = "0" / "1" / "d" / "s" > > The wording for FO has changed to say "0", "1" OR a colon-separated list. Looking at the 7489 ABNF I am wondering if someone could say "fo=0:1:d:s" thanks tim > Olivier > > ------------------------------ > *De: *"Tim Wicinski" <[email protected]> > *À: *"IETF DMARC WG" <[email protected]> > *Envoyé: *Dimanche 10 Mars 2024 01:00:33 > *Objet: *[dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF > > Just picking over the ABNF with my checks, some Qs > > > dmarc-version = "v" equals %s"DMARC1 > > > I believe the "%s" should be dropped > > dmarc-value = %x20-3A | %x3C-7E > > > I think it should be %x20-3A / %x3C-7E > > and now just something suggested. The comments for URI read like this > > ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; commas > ; (ASCII 0x2C) and exclamation points > ; (ASCII 0x21) MUST be encoded > > Could they be rewritten for readability > > ; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986]; > ; (ASCII 0x2C) commas and > ; (ASCII 0x21) exclamation points > ; MUST be encoded > > gladly tell me i'm too obsessive > > > thanks > tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
