On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, Benny Pedersen wrote:
to confusion about DMARC and DKIM test flags. This document is already too
long and too late.
Unless there is an actual problem to solve here, let's close the issue and
finish up.
why is dkim fail here
Because the mailing list modified the message before that header was
applied. The IETF's mail server is a mess, and will be completely
replaced over the next month.
X-Spam-Status No, score=-1.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AUTHRES_DKIM_FAIL=0.5, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.372, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-2, RCVD_IN_ANONMAILS=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=1.3,
SPF_PASS=-0.1] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=ietf.org header.b="Xr+FwPZI"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=ietf.org header.b="Xr+FwPZI"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail
(message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b="qTXLFk6y"; dkim=fail
(2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com
header.b="IB1/7fRP"
Authentication-Results ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit
key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
header.b="qTXLFk6y"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been
altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b="IB1/7fRP"
its already dkim fail at delivery to amsl ?
let me see if eitf still breaks my dkim :=)
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
