It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said:
>On Sun 24/Mar/2024 18:06:53 +0100 John Levine wrote:
>> It appears that Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> said:
>>
>>>https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5774 :: There were a number of edits
>>>for clarification to this portion of the document. The "otherwise specified"
>language is no
>>>longer there, and I believe all concerns have been addressed for this
>>>portion.
>>
>> I think you're right, but checking that schema makes one's eyes glaze.
>
>
>Redundant «minOccurs="1"» certainly don't help the eye. I'm not particularly
>happy with them, but can accept that concern for those who don't know what's
>the default for minOccurs dictates redundancy.
There's a lot of
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"
which add nothing and if it were up to me, I'd delete. But at this point
if we think the XML is correct, let's not mess with it.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
