It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >I have to agree with Seth's comments that "security teams believe an SPF >hard fail is more secure". >I've been on the receiving end of that discussion more than once.
I believe you, but if you reject on SPF fail you're going to lose a lot of mail whether or not you do anything with DMARC. This belongs in an SPF WCP, not a DMARC document. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
